Sunday, January 25, 2015

An impossible to avert PR mess for Maduro

Today two ex-presidents of Latin America, Piñera of Chile and Pastrana of Colombia (supported by Calderon of Mexico who had to bail out at the last minute)  are going to Ramo Verde jail near Caracas to visit Leopoldo Lopez.

This is a no win situation for the regime. If it bars access to two democratically elected ex-presidents it will show itself as having things to hide from international scrutiny on Human Rights (1).  If it allows Piñera and Pastrana into Lopez cell, then we will have an international credible first hand account.

Below a few tweets to try to show you the mood and tell you the story.

It starts with Maduro's insults towards the visitors, reported of course by Maria Corina Machado


Of course, a few chavistas protesting the visitors had to be seen. Chavistas protesting against Human Rights, there you go!



Opposition democratic representatives waiting for Piñera and Pastrana


Some international recognition for the opposition INSIDE Venezuela


Pastrana: the minimum to be expected for a political prisoner is visitation rights


Pastrana waiting in his car for access to the jail. All the world press in front. PR disaster for the regime (not that it cares much at this point I guess)


Pastrana demands the phone number of Miraflores presidential palace


Entry is refused. The regime choosing the worst option. Surprise? Not!


And there you go. Pastrana "if this happens to two ex presidents what can the Venezuelan people expect?"


Piñera states that the vice president blocked the event (of course, Maduro run away cowardly to Saudi Arabia to avoid doing it himself)



Reminding the world that during Venezuela's democratic years Chavez received visits from whomever. But under chavista neo-totalitarianism, there is no such thing for political prisoners.



And to conclude: Piñera "if Maduro wants to be respected, he should learn to respect first". Lapidary!

----------------------------------

Piñera and Pastrana have now a first hand account, a direct witness position on repression in Venezuela. They saw the Nazional Guards everywhere, they were both somewhat threatened by diverse hecklers and possibly by "security", they experienced personally the harshness and autism fo the regime, etc, etc.

This was of course done on purpose as it is inconceivable that Piñera and Pastrana would have tried such a thing without consulting their governments, and maybe others. This is a clear message to the Venezuelan regime. I am afraid they are not getting it. I am afraid they have resigned themselves to become the lone pariah of our continent now that even Cuba is trying to get out of that status.

---------------
1) democratically elected is stressed here as both Pinera and Pastrana won from the opposition. Thus, technically, with odds against them.

Looking for Maduristan

The speech of Maduro last Tuesday left my numbed. All observers, even the regime, agree that Venezuela is today facing a deep, devastating economic crisis. And once again no serious action, not even serious punctual initiatives are taken. The regime is adrift, mined by internal struggles, bereft of the faintest clue as to what to do. And to top it all, after announcing crisis, economic war, sabotage, Maduro flies off, AGAIN, for the burial of the Saudi king when he could have dispatched there his useless vice president. The more so that the Saudi regime did not lend him any money a few days ago.

In recent posts I had mentioned some partial measures that would have improved somewhat the current situation. Not solved it, but improved it enough so as to give the regime more leverage to negotiate the real stuff.  Of course these observations may or may not be worthy and other people advance as many. But the point was to stress that even this late in game there were things the regime could o and should do. And did not once again. I could see it, anyone with half a brain could see it. But the regime refuses to see it.

Instead the regime clung desperately to:


- price of gas that will be discussed and increased in accordance to public transport proposal (in Venezuela "public" transport is in fact private subjected to all sorts of regulations which have resulted in a dangerous system for customers; but I digress). In short, the increase of gas will be left for better political times that will never come and the adjustment will be more painful than it would already be today (international cost of gas is around 75 cents of USD per liter, in Venezuela it is sold at less than one penny, SICAD 2 exchange rate).

- a multitier exchange system that preserve the starting point of the current 6.3 "for food and medicine only" which was already the objective when SICAD 1 and 2 were announced (an admission that it was used for something else in spite of its objectives?). In short the regime has been unable to give up on its major source of graft and corruption, the arbitration process that allows military/bureaucrats to get dollars at 6.3 to resell them at 170. Except that this corruption will become worse as there is not enough currency coming in.

- to satisfy people's deteriorating living standards the regime decrees an increase of 15% of the minimal wage for February first. The inflation of the last three months is already above 15% and the one of February may be by itself of 10%, even without the wage increase. In short, not only this 15% is, well, useless, but it will feed inflation as the regime has no money to pay for that 15%. Banknotes will happily be printed. What next? A 20% increase in April 1?

- the other items of Maduro's speech do not deserve comment besides underlying their vulgarity and uselessness.

When I see the disaster looming and Maduro flying off to Saudi Arabia I can only think of the French expression la fuite en avant, fleeing forward senselessly.  Maybe he is looking for the mythical Maduristan where all of his problems will be solved? Maybe he wants to create Maduristan? Maybe he just wants someone, anyone, make a coup against him while he is away and so leave the disaster for others to solve while he claims victimhood from exile?

Monday, January 19, 2015

Choses vues at the Hunger Games

This one is almost everyday to enter Caracas "EXITO"
near Plaza Venezuela. I have driven past it three times
and seen a variation of it with my own eyes. Once
probably worse than this picture.
I have not written much about the massive food and home supplies shortages that we have experienced this January. To begin with it has been years that I have been commenting about food shortages (1). This is not new, it is just a step closer to some paroxysm in the making. But there is also that fact of life that the first two weeks of January there are occasional shortages of this or that because of the bad habits of Venezuelans to shut down the country as early as the first week of December. Ill calculated inventories in X or Y stores can create a local shortage.

But this year it has become calamitous and bad planning in December cannot by any means account for the current disaster. What is happening now is strictly a direct consequences of the regime's disastrous policies as local producers could not even plan for bad inventories: they simply did what they could and hoped for the best. Now long lines at food stores are headlines world wide, even editorials.


I am not going to the whys here, just tell you a few stories as a witness, even though I consider that I am myself privileged by not eating the kind of food that the people in line want and because , well, my life is too complicated these days to inquire further. And yet you do not need to investigate, it jumps to your eyes by merely driving around.

Everywhere

When in Caracas I live in the Eastern districts. Until now in general we were spared long lines. This is over. Just drive around on your normal errands and you will see long lines at most grocery stores, in particular in the morning when deliveries arrive.  The lines even blocked me this Saturday for the second time ever to enter into my usual family grocery store that I have patronized for 40 years! Diapers had arrived....

It is a different crowd

When you stop at your usual joints you see your usual crowd. When there is a change you notice it. Well, this is happening. It is crystal clear that the bulk of the lines that form in my area come from people that do not live in the area, people that actually live in lower class districts of Petare, for example. How come?  Is Mercal and PDVAL failing in the areas that they are supposed to serve? (2) Why do these people need to trek so far to get ONLY the basic staples? You can look into their carts: there is at most 1 or 2 items, in the allotted amounts by the store to each individual. My cart has the usual items as well as the carts of the locals. You see it, it is not racism, or class division or prejudice. It is an easily observable fact.

Because what is sought by these people are the price controlled items. If, like me, you buy stuff not under price control you can still make a weekly grocery shop of sorts, incomplete but enough to manage. In other words, in case you still do not get it, the poor MUST go to fancier grocery stores to seek stuff that is not consumed as much there but that they need for their daily intake and cannot find in their own neighborhood. Unless they go through scalpers.

Early bird

My cleaning lady tells me her method for the Saturday shopping. Her husband who works on week ends starts to stand in line at the local "Bicentenario" at 5 AM and gets a number (they have stopped marking people because people got fed up and thus the Nazional Guard hands out tickets now). She makes it to the store at 7 wen her hubby needs to leave for work. Then she takes his number and waits an hour more until the store opens and she is allowed in to get whatever it is that the state has been able to find to put up for sale.

It has been months that she has not been able to get all that she requires for her week.

Food fights

This happened to me this afternoon.

I was at work and decided to run to the grocery store close by to get some stuff to make a soup.  So it is around 3:30 and I am with my cart at the veggies section. All is normal. Suddenly big bags of corn flour arrive. It is the one that is price controlled, the "normal" Harina P.A.N.. The one that "el pueblo" wants because there are other presentations like the one I buy which has extra fiber, but costs almost twice as much (though still dirt cheap, a dime or 3 bucks depending on your preferred exchange rate).

Now, even in these times of scarcity IF you are in the store and even IF a particular scarce item is arriving, you will get some because the store sells only a few pounds to each customer. There is plenty of time.

Well, a food fight started and the store personnel had to struggle to bring order and force people to stand in line. Of course, the gates of the store were locked fast to limit the number of people that get in, something that now happens EVERY TIME corn flour, laundry detergent, cooking oil, etc, arrive.

I was in shock and moved away to the refrigerated section not for fear but for shame of witnessing such a sorry scene.  Yet, when I was done and I saw the line normal I just went there and got my 8 pounds of corn flour; for my cleaning lady, by the way, that I gave her as a gift later on. I had already in my cart 4 pounds of the fiber enriched flour.

Thus there was ENOUGH for the customers attending at arrival, but people are now panicking at a possible lack of food.

But this was not all. During these brief minutes, and in spite of controlled access, the store managed to fill up and long lines were at the cashiers and most of the line were people carrying ONLY their 8 ponds. And many, well, that did not look like regulars. So, for an errand that would have taken me less than a half hour, I had to spend more than an hour until I could get back to the office. Also I saw plenty of people from my office and others who were there, having been warned of the arrival and abandoning their desks on the spot to run and get some. How can we forbid them to do so?

If this happens to me in "protected" and allegedly "civilized" areas, I shiver at the idea of what is going on in Catia or Petare.........

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
1) The first time I did a report on food shortages was on January 14 2006. 9 years ago!  Since then I did several picture posts of different aspects of food shortages. You may visit them if you want and realize that those shortages were actually not as bad as the ones we are going through this time around.

2) Mercal and PDVAL are the subsidized food distribution stores that Chavez set for electoral purposes and that paid off handsomely.

Sunday, January 18, 2015

Thelma and Louise sponsored by idiot consultants

It seems that we have reached that Thelma & Louise moment, where a regime finds itself on the edge of the cliff, trying to decide whether to jump, while idiot consultants tell them it is nice and sunny, after the fall.
Hoarding, according to Maduro & Co.

I am not going to go much on Maduro trip around three continents. Thinking that he was a foreign minister once (he was not, he was Chavez errands boy), thinking that his skills would make him succeed where Ramirez failed, he went to a whole bunch of countries looking for deals and for higher oil prices. His novice, and incompetent, team accumulated one faux-pas after another, and in the end he looked the part of the guy hat in hand, begging for handouts, and not getting any.

His triumphal return to Venezuela was not a success even though Internet was down for half a day, delaying the pictorial diffusion of his poor reception committee.

So now he is back at Miraflores Palace, nothing to show, rumors of his demise growing fast as the short food shortage lines he left behind early January have become long hunger headlines around the world. Bouts of violence are now routinely recorded, and all the scandals of preceding months (colectivos, violence, chikungunya, what not) have taken a back seat to the population anxious search for diapers and food.

What does he chose to do? Well, he seems to be willing to jump from the cliff. He starts by offering even more "socialism" and issues an ultimatum to, hold to your hats, the food distribution system. As if those could hoard enough stuff, stuff that, to begin with, is not produced in Venezuela. I can vouch personally for it: we do not have enough supplies to produce all of the food needs for Venezuela. FEDECAMARAS, the business association, gives, what I find optimistic, 45 days left of manufacturing. It does not matter whether food distributors want to hoard food and soap, there is nothing to hoard. Anyone that holds a real job in the food industry that looks at the pictures shown by the regime as alleged hoarding will know immediately that what is on the floors represent at best a couple of weeks of the normal distribution schedule. Given the difficulties to operate in Venezuela, even that meager two weeks cannot be dispatched as fast as anyone would want.

Even workers went out against the intervention of the state, defending their jobs against a rapacious regime that could not care less about their livelihood.  Never mind that the accused Fedecamaras replied very simply: with all busienss that are now in hands of the state, where the products that these busienss were supposed to make? From "guayuco" diapers to Diana edible oils. There is that precious 2009 video of Chavez announcing the Venezuelan socialist diaper which I am afraid has never been seen since.



It is that simple, there is no hoarding, there is a lack of production driven by the government policies, from needed currency to import supplies, to a chaotic transportation system for the little bit left to distribute. Again, my business itself is a direct victim of this disaster.

I am reserving the political implications of this debacle for a future post, just wanting here to impress on the reader that the crisis has started in earnest and that the regime has no clue about what to do.

Unfortunately the regime is not helped out by idiotic consultants that write the most senseless things.

I read an interesting article, recommended on Tweet by no one else but Moises Naim, where people from Barclay or a joint called Capital Economics offer mathematical solutions to Venezuela. The one that particularly infuriated me was the expert of Capital Economics, unnamed, that simply says that Venezuela should start by devaluating to a single currency exchange of 100 and the basic problem would be taken care of.

This formula or another will do
for Venezuela economics
I suppose that this consultant had in mind shock therapies such as the ones from Eastern Europe in the 90ies, countries which had nothing left to their name and could afford such a trauma. But if the regime had the bad idea to risk a mere devaluation of that magnitude in Venezuela it would be a disaster. Civil rebellion would be almost instantaneous. Civil war would surely follow close behind. And further more, that Capital Economics jerk is apparently unaware that the debilitated private sector would go belly up with such a devaluation. I wonder how does he think Venezuela will pay its debt to his customer? Or is he actually advocating such a disaster so that his customers will be able to buy for peanuts Venezuelan companies? It has to be that last one or he is a completely misinformed idiot. I would turn towards Iglesias or Tsipras for less than that...

At any rate. We have reached the end of the road. The regime has two choices: either bury the chavista revolution or start shooting people. I am afraid that the second one will be the choice since so many people would face jail terms if the country became more "normal".  Which of course makes the cliff only higher, the crash only more spectacular.

Thursday, January 15, 2015

The fiscal problem in Venezuela

These days Maduro is flying around the world as a beheaded chicken.  Why? He has no cash, no economy, and his only hope for political survival is to have oil go back to 80 USD a barrel. Hat in hand, default threats in hand, he is a sorry sight.  But 80 is not going to happen; and even if it were to happen it would not be enough.

I may want to digress as much as I want on a productivity problem in Venezuela, but there is a fiscal problem that looms even larger. Readers of this blog must remember that it has been quite a while we have started to discuss that the crazed currency problem is not been addressed as it should. Devaluations come late, incomplete and without a plan to avoid a new one. Budget deficits kept happily expanding as the regime needed more and more cash to buy voters that asked more and more for their vote. And now that the oil prices have collapsed we are about to consider eating our pets. But there are some solutions that could go a long way to stabilize the country and allow it to negotiate better surrendering terms with the IMF, WB or China (1).

Interestingly, in spite of the coming financial cataclysm, the regime has finally taken two tiny measures that, let's be generous, may solve 2% of the problem (2). And then they sent Maduro to Russia and China and Qatar to ask for money. Of course, the cash he asks for is to run the electoral campaign next year. Donors have not been fooled apparently. China will invest "in the future", and sand ridden Qatar will make joint agricultural ventures with Venezuela, a diplomatic mockery if I ever so one.

Before reading further you need to make sure you understand the chaotic and out of reality way the regime proceeds. You also need to understand that what I propose below has no chance to be developed rationally by the regime and will only happen when it is cornered, in a bad way. Because, let's face it, any serious non-populist measure will be the death knell of the revolution as, among other things, chavismo would break up. Or does anyone think that Maduro can go to the IMF without political consequences?

The local deficit problem

I am going to divide the rest of this post in two parts: this first one about the government deficit in local currency.

This one must be solved fast because the regime cannot fire bureaucrats and misiones beneficiaries fast enough. Never mind  that cutting off 20% of its payroll in bureaucracy or welfare would push  us further into recession, with even less consumers, more social instability.

The regime is seriously considering increase taxes further which in today's context would be lethal for the economy as businesses still alive barely make it through. Reminder; if you have 60% inflation your business must have benefits of 61% or start losing its value. That is, if your business does not make more than inflation you erode your capital and you are better off closing up the shop. I can assure you that in Venezuela today no one makes 61% return today. We are heroes just by keeping payroll.

No, the ONLY way to at least solve in part the cash problem at home is to (drum roll) increase the price of gas. The good news here is that gas is so cheap and inflation so high that actually bringing the price of gas to at least its cost of production and distribution will not affect much companies costs. I am willing to bet that even transport companies have their gas cost below 1% of all of their other costs. Bringing up that cost item to 5 or even 10% will not force them to increase their prices much. Do the math.

Granted, you may not want to go from zero to actual cost in an instant but you could explain to the country that there will be gas price increases every month for a year until people start paying the true price of gas.

But this such a self inflicted political hot potato that even talk of gas hikes have disappeared! Reminder: Chavez said that as long as he was president gas will not increase. Perhaps the lone promise he kept, even if it wrecked the country.

Another easy measure that will cost nothing and that would go a long way is to return to previous owners a lot of the nationalized business. They are costing a fortune, they are producing less than what they did, if at all, they are a source of corruption. Since they have also been looted, give them back to the old owners for free and allow tax exemption for all the cash required to build back the business. Trust me, you will find takers- And the taxes the state fail to collect? Who cares! As long as business remains state owned there would be no taxes to collect anyway. But at least privatization would get you sales taxes again.

Just these two measures allow for the regime to maintain crucial welfare programs and the bulk of public payroll while the real necessary reforms can be designed and taken.

UPDATE
This morning I read a recent article from the Economist about energy subsidies versus education expenses. Dramatic picture on the right on how gas subsidies helped wreck Venezuela as a whole.

The foreign currency problem

With the price of oil down and a huge debt in USD, what can the country do? Very little, but there are things that it should try anyway.

Clearly, a devaluation is long overdue. And it should be, on paper, at around 60 to one USD, Depreciating the currency by 90% in a swell swoop would mean that we all go bankrupt at once, that the country simple stops to function.We have been under currency control for soon a decade and a half and the system is so twisted that you just cannot get out of it like that. Still, you need to do it. A possible solution is not too complicated, and if applied may already bring indulgences from lenders.

Set a plan to go back to free convertibility over a year, two top.

We start with a devaluation of the 6.3 official to 15 and merge it to the 12 SICAD 1 rate that is basically useless (3). Today most business calculate their costs at 25 and plus if they can get away with it. So, bringing it up at 15 and letting is float up by, say, 25 cents of bolivar a week could begin a necessary correction without bringing a crushing inflation or total economic paralysis.

While this new official currency rate is set, strictly for food and medicine, keep the SICAD 2 and let it slide slowly but surely away from 51. Bring most items not covered at preferential 15 to SICAD 2.

And, MOST IMPORTANT allow for a fee legal exchange rate where people who have no access to official or SICAD 2 can buy USD at whichever rate their are crazy enough to buy. I, for one, think the current 175 is crazy, but if the regime does not make adjustments and keep printing money the 175 will be cheap in a matter of a few weeks. My guess is that if the black market were to be made legal within a few weeks, if the other reforms are undertaken, the free bolivar may be less than 140. At any rate, start pulling away from SICAD 2 items and let them go free, one by one.

The objective is to merge by January 2016 SICAD2 and free Bolivar at whatever value results. And then plan to bring in final free convertibility  by the first semester of 2016, or as soon as recession weakens.

Of course, I am not entering in what percentage of what goes to what exchange rate. I cannot. What I am writing above is the kind of currency scheme that could be tolerable for private business to weather the worst of the crisis and perhaps start growing already by the last quarter of 2015. Unfortunately this is not going to happen because 1) too many corrupt folks benefit too much from the 6.3/170 arbitration and 2) thus you would need to take currency control AWAY from political hands, like in a real independent central bank.

Never mind that this would require special loans from IMF and the like....

But there is another problem that could kill any attempt at restoration.

Private business has several thousand of millions of dollar in outstanding debts. These, the business have the bolivars to pay for it but the regime has not allowed for the USD to be transferred to providers. These providers have run out of patience and now refuse to send raw material unless paid IN ADVANCE, IN FOREIGN CURRENCY. Something that the regime, well, does not have anymore. Those billions have disappeared in thin air and yet they are owed, there is no way around. What to do?

Again there is a way. As I have written above most business already calculate their prices above 20 bolivares per USD (or more, depending on the area).  Thus we can ask them to take a hit and chip in financially to save the country and not go bankrupt outright as no one will sell them a grain of raw material to work.

Negotiate with the IMF a special loan strictly to pay well documented private debt. That loan, maybe 6 billion USD, will be used by an independent agency to pay the providers debt with, say, a 20% hit. What does the private business gets in exchange? Payment of their debt in a few weeks and the ability to start importing raw material again with loans but this time at a more real currency figure. Yes, it is not a great deal but it would allow for a lot of companies not to go bankrupt and maybe revive within a year or two. That loan of course would be paid by the state long term and since there is no asset its backing would be a political one signed by both opposition and chavismo. Again: its functions will be handled AWAY from government hands. Business that do not want to take that 20% hit can be left waiting for the regime to pay for them at 6.3 some imaginary day in the future.

CONCLUSION

There is a productivity and a financial problem in Venezuela. Both need to be addressed away from the chavista model. There is no way around. The revolution is dead, or must become a sanguinary dictatorship which is a death of its own anyway.

What I presented in these tow posts are partial measures that would allow for the private sector not to die and start a recovery, the only way Venezuela can retain some economical independence in the future. Many other structural reforms are needed to make Venezuela gain a viable state: decentralization, tax reform, judicial independence, true accountability, a nations' development guidelines, etc, etc...  But all of these take years and that is a luxury we do not have. Yet taking what I explained in these two entries would be more than a mere band-aid. And would allow for better negotiation terms with any lender, be it the IMF or a consortium of countries.

Going around like Maduro does pathetically will not work.

-------------------------------------------------

1) I must remind readers that I am no economist but I am writing from ground zero, about the obvious, but an obvious that apparently chavismo is unable to perceive even in broad daylight. Thus what follows is not a discussion of macro economic packages that could be taken, but rather simple measures that the regime could already do that would lower the pressure and maybe, besides proving its good intentions, allow to get better deals from prospective lenders.

2) The first measure are to start a devolution of some functions to the states, functions that had been centralized by Chavez when all knew that it would never work. They start reestablishing tolls on highways and let the proceeds go to regional authorities to at least clean the roads and patch the worst potholes. Besides being the first major rebuke to Chavez policies, we must note that unless tolls are adequate there is little the regions will be able to do. Let's not look forward for safer roads any time soon.

The other measure is the novel concept that people should actually save to be able to afford overseas travel, that the government has no business subsidizing vacation travel. As such, what should have been done two years ago has started: travel expenses will now be payed for at SICAD2, which is the worst exchange rate at 51 for a USD. Note that the black market is at 171 but I digress.  Let's focus on the positive: you have lost your "right" to go shopping to Miami. Now you need to save for a few years to be able to go, like everyone else does around the world. Innovation bolivarian style!

3) Reminder, the country has today 4, FOUR exchange rates. An official one at 6.3 that almost no one has access to it. A SICAD 1 at around 12 that is all but imaginary. A SICAD 2 floating between 50 and 60 which is basically the lone one with some meaning. And the black market one at 170!!!!!! I let you imagine how graft is encouraged through that crazy scheme.


Monday, January 12, 2015

Picture of the day

I would be remiss not to post what may be the most publicized picture from yesterday's Paris march.


Sunday, January 11, 2015

La República, y el chaverío

Place de la République, hacia las 2 PM
Lo que paso en Francia esta semana fue realmente asombroso. Pasamos casi sin pestañear, por el impacto, de la barbarie a la defensa extraordinaria de los valores que representan una verdadera República. Todos los que entienden de verdad como opera el mundo entendieron claramente que los atentados de esta semana en París eran una agresión, una guerra a muerte contra la democracia y el estado de derecho, de cuales la libertad de expresión es su mayor valor. No importó que hubiese 1, 10, 100 o 1000 muertos, el peso del símbolo buscado por los fundamentalistas islámicos era acobardar la libertad de expresión.

Eso no pasó. Incluso regímenes donde ya no existe la libertad de expresión tuvieron que redactar de mala gana escuetos comunicados de apoyo a Francia como hizo Venezuela; o para las dictaduras mas sofisticadas como Rusia, mandar a algun ministro.


El día nos dio increíbles muestras de respaldo no solo al dolor de Francia, pero mucho mas allá, al dolor que el mundo occidental experimenta cuando su valor mas descriptivo fue vilmente atacado. Muchos fueron los países que mandaron su jefe de gobierno a marchar, aunque sea por una sola cuadra, a París, junto al presidente francés Hollande. Hasta un milagro se vio, el de unir en una misma foto a Israel y Palestina.

De izquierda a derecha, según logro identificar:
España, Reino Unido, (alcaldesa Paris), Comisión Europea, Israel, Mali,
Francia
Alemania, Polonia, Autoridad Palestina, Italia, Turquía, Suiza, Ucrania 
Extraña que las Américas no hayan mandado un solo presidente o primer ministro. Claro está, para la gran mayoría de los de sur América la libertad de expresión es algo a veces a penas tolerado, un mal necesario que solo Ecuador y Venezuela han decidido cuartar de una buena vez. Extraña aun mas que los EE.UU. no hayan mandado aunque sea Clinton...

Pero hubo otros símbolos poderosos. Seguramente hubo una excelente coordinación para crear esos símbolos. Pero eso no importa, todos fueron ávidos participes en la simbologia republicana, democrática.  Empecemos por la canciller alemana, de derechas, poniendo su cabeza sobre el hombro del presidente francés, de izquierdas. Cuantos millones de sus ciudadanos murieron en sus guerras, pero sentimientos republicanos permitieron esa reconciliación.

Pero si existe un país donde "La República" es un valor esencial de la sociedad ese es Francia. La inmensa participación francesa este sábado y domingo en marchas y reuniones a través de todo el país ya lo demuestra (se estima seriamente que tal vez 7 millones de franceses marcharon, número sin precedente en la historia europea y tal vez mundial).  Pero la clase política francesa se exigió a si misma símbolos aun mayores. En la foto que sigue el presidente Hollande recibió al mismo tiempo al ex presidente Francés Sarkozy, y los cuatro recientes primeros ministros de derechas. También recibió por separado primeros ministros de izquierdas y personalidades francesas, pero esta foto es todo un símbolo de lo que Francia entiende por "La République".

Raffarin, Balladur, Sarkozy, Hollande, Juppé, Fillon
a la entrada formal del Palacio presidencial de Paris, l'Elysée

La República para los franceses es un valor real, tangible. En Francia es normal que para los grandes momentos la "oposición" figure. La oposición y el gobierno son parte del estado de derecho y por lo tanto ambos merecen el debido respeto preparándose siempre a  la esperada alternancia.

En Venezuela ese valor se ha perdido. Es imposible imaginar hoy en día en Caracas una circunstancia donde el actual gobierno invite sin insultos, sin amenazas, sin desprecio a la oposición política de Venezuela. Sea cual fuese esa. Yo creo que ni siquiera una bomba en la tumba de Bolívar podría unirnos. Al fin y al cabo los únicos "valores" patrios son hoy en día los que Chávez decidió él solo, desde el estrellato banderil hasta el ridículo y desfigurante mausoleo a Bolívar. Lo que podríamos llamar el chaverío, lo que nos dejó Chávez, ha sido una monstruosidad sectaria sin paragón en nuestra historia, y con pocas referencias en el mundo, países como Cuba o Corea del Norte.

Pero no podemos sorprendernos: ya en el desastre de Vargas Chávez rechazaba ayuda bien intencionada, aunque nuestro pueblo tenga que sufrir por sus caprichos. Desde el año 2000 hemos sido advertidos que el que estaba sentado en Miraflores no era un republicano. Sin hablar de su carácter felón en 1992.

Mientras pasaba todo esto en París que hacia Venezuela? Escasez de comida.

Pues bien, desde el extranjero el presidente insultó a las victimas de las políticas del chaverío acusándolas del desabastecimiento, de las inhumanas colas a pleno sol que hemos tenido que soportar este principio de 2015. El desabastecimiento según el no es por el desastre económico de sus políticas, sino por una guerra económica que él no termina de demostrar. Claro, en una república de verdad no se puede acusar sin pruebas, pero si se puede en un chaverío.

Pero es con sus amanuenses que se destila la mas baja vileza.

Tenemos la sencilla idiotez y sorna del gobernador de Yaracuy prohibiendo por decreto hacer cola antes de las 7 AM.  Se prohíbe la enfermedad y por ende no habrá más pacientes. La escasez termina con el fin de las colas.

El cínico Carlos Osorio, otro milico, vicepresidente para la Seguridad y Soberanía Alimentaria, va mas allá que el gobernador de Yaracuy (de familia militar, igual). Osorio nos dice que si hay colas es porque hay comida en Venezuela. O sea que en Francia donde no hay colas es porque la gente no va a perder tiempo en comprar comida que no hay. ¿En que república seria puede hablar un ministro de tal manera y que no se le pida la renuncia? Pero en una dictadura militar cualquier milico es un sabio.

Pero lo peor nos viene del propio vice presidente de Venezuela. Sencillamente dice que en la prisión militar de Ramo Verde hay celdas libres para poner opositores que insistan en protestar por la escasez. No existe república seria donde un personaje que nunca ha sido electo a nada llegue tan cerca del poder, un poder absolutamente corrupto, y pueda decir tales barbaridades, solo porque tuvo sexo con la hija del líder gigante. Los sistemas hereditarios no son repúblicas, por mera definición.

Seria bueno que los que se llaman dirigentes del chavismo, pero lejos de las arcas mayores, se den cuenta de lo que están apoyando. Eso no es una república, es un bodrio, un chaverío. Vean lo que paso esta semana en París y entiendan.

----------------------

Para los que no entiendan todavía lo que significa una república, unas costumbres republicanas me permito agregar este vídeo. No importa si entienden una que otra audible palabra en Francés. Solo tengan en mente cuando lo vea que se trata de la salida del Palacio del Eliseo de los invitados a las ceremonias de hoy. Salen a pie distinguidos invitados extranjeros, miembros del gobierno, miembros de la oposición política francesa. Salen a pie a montarse sin orden particular en autobuses, como cualquier grupo de personas asistiendo a una convención. Es verdad, alguno que otro se lleva también su guarda espalda como el primer ministro de Israel a quien si es verdad que quieren matar y que con unos 3 guarda espaldas se conforma. ¿Se imaginarían ustedes Maduro o un ministro del chaverío sin su docena de guarda espaldas, montándose en un autobús con gente que no le agrada?


Marche républicaine : membres du gouvernement... by LCP

Friday, January 9, 2015

A Churchillian moment for France

As the horror kept unfolding through Paris with a terrorist taking hostage a Jewish supermarket I am too taken in angst to write my own words. But BERNARD-HENRI LÉVY has words for us, taken in full from the WSJ for those like me who cannot afford the subscription price.

A France United Against Radical Islam
It’s time to break, finally, from Leninist reasoning about the sociology of poverty and frustration behind terrorism.


At the Place des Terreaux in Lyon, France, after the Jan. 7 terror attack in Paris.


Twelve faces. Twelve names, some of which the killers specifically called out, as the name of a condemned prisoner is called out before his execution. Twelve symbols mourned around the globe, symbols of the assassination of freedom of laughter and of thought. The least that we owe to these dozen dead is to rise to their level of commitment and courage—and, today, to prove worthy of their legacy.

It is incumbent upon the leaders of France, of the West, and of the world to take the measure of a war they did not want to see, one in which the journalists of Charlie Hebdo, its writers and caricaturists, long ago put themselves on the front line. They were war reporters of a sort, as we now know, Robert Capas with a sketch pad and pencil.

This is the Churchillian moment of France’s Fifth Republic, the moment to face the implacable truth about a test that promises to be long and trying.It is time for us to break, once and for all, with the Leninist reasoning that has been served up for so long by the useful idiots of a radical Islam immersed in the sociology of poverty and frustration. And most of all it is the moment, now or never, for a calm resolve among all believers in democracy to look evil in the face without losing ourselves in the catastrophic measures of a state of emergency. France can and must erect dikes—but not the walls of a besieged fortress.

To us as citizens falls the duty of not reacting to terrorism with fright or by arming ourselves against that obsessive fear of the other that nearly always follows such explosions. As I write, democratic moderation seems to have prevailed. The “Je suis Charlie” movement that sprang up simultaneously in cities across France after the massacre showed a spirit of resistance worthy of the best the country has been and known. And the arsonists of souls who preach nonstop about the unbreachable gulf between being French by blood or just on paper—the troublemakers of the National Front and elsewhere—can only be disappointed by this unified response.

The question is whether the moderate spirit can endure in France. It is essential that the de facto democratic union of people across the religious and political spectrum who filled the streets in the hours following the carnage continue to mount a response to the “France for the French” of Marine Le Pen and her far-right ilk. Because France for the French is the opposite of national unity. From Cato the Elder to the theoreticians of the modern social contract, the beautiful idea of national unity never mistakes its true enemy. National unity is a sign that the French have understood that the Charlie Hebdo killers are not “the Muslims,” but rather the small fraction of Muslims who confuse the Quran with a death warrant.

Those whose faith is Islam must proclaim very loudly, very often and in great numbers their rejection of this corrupt and abject form of theocratic passion. Too often have we heard that France’s Muslims should be summoned to explain themselves. They don’t need to explain themselves, but they should feel called to express their tangible brotherhood with their massacred fellow citizens. In so doing, they would put to rest once and for all the lie of a spiritual commonality between their faith as they know it and that of the murderers.

They have the responsibility—the opportunity—before history and their own conscience to echo the “Not in our name!” with which Britain’s Muslims dissociated themselves last year from the Islamic State killers of journalist James Foley. But they also have the even more urgent duty to define their identity as sons and daughters of an Islam of tolerance and peace.

Islam must be freed from radical Islam. We must say and say again: To assassinate in the name of God is to make God an assassin by association. What is needed from Islamic scholars and their many followers is a courageous statement of modernization—like theaggiornamento of the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s—clearly stating that, in a democracy, forcing obeisance to the holy is an attack on the freedom of thought. They should explicitly acknowledge that in the eyes of the law, religions are systems of thought with no greater or lesser status than that of secular ideologies—and that the right to doubt them, debate them and laugh at them, like the right to join or leave them, is the inalienable right of every citizen.

In the dark times ahead, battles await: Islam against Islam, pluralistic civilization against the nihilists of jihad. But it is really one war, and we must wage it together, united.

Mr. Lévy’s books include “Left in Dark Times: A Stand Against the New Barbarism” (Random House, 2008). This op-ed was translated from the French by Steven B. Kennedy.

Wednesday, January 7, 2015

#JeSuisCharlie

Words have failed me through the day.

It is not enough that in one of my countries my freedoms have been reduced to their finite expression, just enough that I am not forced to leave right now. Though the clock is running faster.

But my other country has been struck in what it is dearest in our hearts: freedom of expression, freedom to dissent, freedom to be civilized, freedom to make fun of.

The well prepared attack in Paris today was as deliberate as 9/11 was. The real difference is the number of bodies. Both attacks aimed at destroying a core value of Western Civilization. At the WTC it was freedom to live as you see fit, freedom to try to make a life for yourself. At Charlie Hebdo it was freedom to think.

And the world has understood that very well. I think that not even 9/11 raised such an unanimous condemnation as today did. Not because 9/11 was less despicable than today, but because it has finally become clear for all that a small group of people want war, not a war between civilizations, not a war on different interests, but a war between civilization and barbarism. Secretary John Kerry ever careful to downplay his francophone past spoke in French. The Italian prime minister polished French reminded that for many educated Italians speaking French was natural. Barack Obama reminded us of the shared destiny of France and the US since the beginning, in all aspects now. We saw Iran and Saudi Arabia, and former French colonies sending supporting messages to France.

Even Maduro felt obliged to chime in through Twitter, even though his regime has been attacking and killing journalists for the past 15 years. How quickly he forgets that on 9/11 Lina Ron became famous for protesting against the US embassy in favor of Bin Laden men. But Chavez and too many chavistas have been promoting barbarity of all types and maybe suddenly they felt a chill, they felt that this time around they may want to pretend to belong to the civilized rude awakening. The world is going to look harder on those who fake it.

I truly think that Chalie Hebdo is the epilogue of 9/11, a cycle completed. We had a chance to deal with those facts and causes for a decade but we have not been able to come together on solutions. Now, time is over, we must confront our failings. Or it is going to get worse.

Monday, January 5, 2015

We need the Fashion Police in Moscow (in memoriam Joan Rivers)

Maduro went hat in hand looking for fresh cash to avoid taking the measures he knows will do him in. Next a pictorial assay of the ridiculous and the "fail!".


Maduro arrived at the airport. On his right his wife, the first "combatiente" because in a revolution there is no first Lady, only combat females. However what is most aggravating is not the nickname of Cilia Flores (perhaps the real power behind the throne) but the fashion statement of the hugely ridicule tricolor scarf and the gangsta bonnet of Cilia.



Even the wrapping for the flower arrangement is cheap, tacky- As befit the occasion I suppose.

But the guy had a meeting. After all he was there and Putin could not dismiss him just like that even though Maduro is rudely crashing in a few countries. So they did manage to have him meet a vice foreign minister. Not even Lavrov could be bothered with a creep looking for a life saver when the Russians themselves are, how could I say it nicely, short of cash defending themselves from a run on the ruble (amen of other real issues like Crimea, Ukraine, Syria, etc.).

So there are the two pictures from VTV itself. Clearly no one has any idea at the propaganda ministry of Jacqueline Faria or inside the close entourage of Maduro in that trip. Are they that desperate that the only thing they can come up with is a gross scarf?

Observe the following.




Lack of formality of the room. This ain't the palatial Kremlin. Is it even heated? Some have not removed their heavy coats. And were is the press corps? Only one guy on the right taking pics from his smart phone? Might as well do selfies. Well, there is at least a single man film crew...


But there is more. Maduro has a new silly sport jacket (Russian flag colors?).  And he brought along decoration elements besides the Venezuelan flag: a portrait of Chavez (and the ersatz Bolivar from Chavez visible in the above picture left).  Observe also that there are more than half dozen Venezuelans while the Russians have a mere three bureaucrats....

I do not know why, but I have the feeling that the Russians sent a message to Maduro... But I doubt he got it. Then again they are desperate enough not to get any message.

BONUS.



There is an arranged set of additional pictures in Faria twitter time line. At least in that more recent tweet she stresses the word "technical stop", to lower expectations and explain away the informality. Even though bringing Chavez and Bolivar decor spoke of other expectations.....

What we can say from the top left picture is that Cilia did not have a good night and that the flowers were clearly bought in a hurry at the airport gift shop..... No blond pig tailed little girl in traditional grab to hand them.

PS: by the way, pictures hide the Cuban airplane used for the trip.


Sunday, January 4, 2015

El monstruo de Miraflores

Antes de que se me acuse de terrorismo, o de conspiración, o, por que no, de apatridismo por llamar a Nicolás Maduro el monstruo de Miraflores ruego que me permitan demostrar que los crimines que Nicolás ha cometido son más graves que los que presuntamente habría cometido al que llama el monstruo de Ramo Verde, Leopoldo López (vídeo).


No voy a mencionar crímenes de Nicolás Maduro que no puedo probar tal como matar oficialmente a Hugo Chávez el día que mejor convenía a sus herederos políticos. Solo basta mencionar los que están a la luz pública, ampliamente comentados en la prensa, incluso la oficialista, crímenes que si Maduro no ha cometido con su mano directamente, el sí ha permitido y tal vez guiado las manos que sí cometieron esos crímenes, por ser presidente, por dar las ordenes, por no castigar a los abusadores.

En primer línea, claro está, los asesinatos cometidos en sus labores de represión por la Guardia Nacional. Crímenes filmados, documentados, donde culpables reciben condecoraciones de Maduro.

Pero si estos crímenes fueron los más impactantes, desafortunadamente no han sido los más numerosos. Los crímenes que Maduro carga en sus manos son muchos.

Son los de los enfermos que murieron porque no fueron atendidos por los hospitales, por falta de médicos, falta de insumos, falta de medicamentos.

Son de los miles de ciudadanos asesinados porque a Maduro no le pareció necesario profesionalizar la policía, incrementarla, autorizar el control y desarme de los colectivos. Tampoco puso muchas trabas al tráfico de drogas que estimula la inseguridad.

Son de los presos que mueren porque a su gobierno no le entra en gana construir más cárceles, más humanas, mientras otra monstrua protege los pranes y sus abusos.

Nicolás Maduro ha detentado la faz visible del poder por dos años y son muchos los crímenes que ha cometido en sus dos años, porque él carga la culpa por dejarlos cometer, porque no hizo nada para impedirlos.

Vamos a pensar que la propuesta de Maduro tiene validez, que López sí es un monstruo por las muertes de febrero del 2014. ¿Cuántas muertes han sido? ¿40? ¿Cuántas muertes de enfermos, por el hampa, por el hambre tiene Maduro? ¿Más de 40?

Pero su peor crimen, a la fecha, lo ha cometido hoy. Maduro dijo estar dispuesto a canjear a López Mendoza por el puertorriqueño López Rivera con un pasado de terrorista comprobado en tribunales independientes. Ya sabemos que los tribunales de Venezuela no son independientes y que Maduro, tal como hacia Chávez, anuncia la sentencia antes del inicio del juicio.

Me preguntaran por que considero ese canje como un crimen. Pues bien, al ofrecer ese tipo de canje públicamente Maduro confirma su condición de dictador primitivo, como en los tiempos de la Guerra Fria. Al comportarse como un dictador canjeador de vidas humanas por conveniencia política Maduro nos confirma que como dictador está dispuesto a cometer más crímenes con tal de aferrase al poder.

The productivity problem in Venezuela

The mismanagement of Venezuela has created a rather weird economical crisis: very high inflation with a collapsing production.  The result is that in spite of potential high prices nobody wants or can produce; and a bankrupt regime cannot import all what is needed to replace the missing production. The question begs: why has production collapsed in Venezuela even though we have the resources and the people to produce?


I am not going to discuss the early Chavez years polices that brought us to this cliff.  You all know about political expropriations, rampant populism, waste of resources overseas, etc... What was lost then is lost and cannot be rebuilt just like that. What interests me are the reasons that do not allow the remaining producers to, well, produce. The problems are thus: very low worker productivity, huge administrative costs caused by the regime's policies, unreasonable taxes (I am not writing excessive, I am writing unreasonable), impossibility to get all the supplies, services and raw materials you need to be able to produce.

Low worker productivity

You cannot have 15 years of "proletariat" speech, of hatred to the capitalist oppressor, of plentiful of rights for the workers without any obligations, and what not without consequences. To this you add the new labor law decreed in 2012 to help Chavez reelection and basically there is no way you can have productive workers. Even the good ones, the ones that believe in the company, that believe in bonus, promotions and other incentives of modern capitalism are dragged down by those who for all practical purposes are sabotaging their work, .

The point here is that it is nearly impossible to fire someone making no more than 4 minimum wage, representing in production services at least half to 2/3 of the personnel. To fire someone you need to catch him raping a secretary during office hours or have her recorded on tape stealing from the cash register. Technically if you give a "double" severance package and get the permit from the "inspectoria del trabajo" (local labor ministry delegation) you could fire anyone. But the Inspectoria never grants its permission (unless it is a state company asking for it, as you would expect in a dictatorship). The only option you have is to negotiate with the trouble maker a sum that goes well above legal severance pay. And the difference is described as bonus to the worker for excellent services, since it is not legal to fire...

I let you guess how this increases labor costs, including increased costs from demoralized workers that see the creep getting away with murder. Of course, in 90% of the cases the trouble matter is a chavista or pretends to be.

It is imperative to have a labor force that works again. We are not in the early XIX century of human exploitation. There are plenty of laws now protecting the health of the worker, ensuring decent wages, protecting them from all sorts of abuses. But if you want to be competitive in the world you need workers to also do their share.

My suggestion here is that the regime changes the no-firing policy for a no reduction of payroll. That is, you can fire whomever you want, at double cost, BUT you need to hire a replacement in, say, 2 months. The commie regime would certainly refuse that because it is a way to accept the return of some meritocracy. However, speaking from ground zero, I can assure that "constant payroll" would increase in a matter of months productivity by as much as 20%, helping inflation control.

Huge administrative cost provoked by the regime needs to control it all

The best example for that is that NO TRUCK with food items or supplies for the manufacturing of food can take up the road without permit from the government. It is incredible that the regime accuses the opposition to promote contraband at the borders SINCE the only way to circumvent SADA and other organizations of that ilk is through regime internal complicity. And that complicity can only come through the army that patrols the roads.

But there also many useless regulations that create costs. Rather than go into the details let me tell you what is actually the worst outcome: constant inspections. They are very costly because the state inspectors are very arrogant, demand that all activities be stopped at least on administrative level so that they can be attended immediately and at will for any item they wish to see. Never mind that if the inspectors come from Caracas you have often to pay for all of their expenses...

These inspections have only one purpose: scare the private sector, put political pressure on business owners, try to subvert the mood of workers when inspectors manage to find an irregularity.  Reducing them or making them more sensible could increase productivity by, my guess, 5%. It also would reduce costs in that most business now are paying administrative workers, and lawyers, strictly to deal with the morass of paperwork demanded. I suggest that a company that passes an inspection should be exempted for at least one full yer before there is a return of the given bureaucracy, except, of course, for the sanitary inspections. Today companies like Polar are inspected and reinspected and rereinspected through the year....

Unreasonable taxes

In Venezuela taxes are excessive for the development level of the country, but there plenty of ways to lower the bill. This is not what I have in mind. What bothers me are unreasonable taxes.  Let's discuss the LOCTI, the law that forces business to invest part of their receipts in technological development.

For this blogger the LOCTI may have been the only "good" law that Chavez ever promoted. Companies were supposed to invest a percentage of their receipts, not their earnings, on technological development. That investment had to be approved by the regime's corresponding office but you were reasonably free to present your project, or give your money to a campus of your choice or pay for training for your workers. If none of them applied to you, then you could give it to the state that would invest in research or higher education.

The law worked so well for a couple of years that the regime had to change it. See, everybody understood that being forced to invest in technology was not a bad thing, and that it could make you more competitive and productive by international standards. Ourselves did three projects approved, one supporting a researcher, one to buy a heavy analytic laboratory equipment and one for a series of course for our administrative personnel. And we were duly inspected and pass the inspection with flying colors, proving that not only we did do the investment but we put it to work and even increased payroll.

What did the regime do? It forced everyone to put the money with the state and ONLY if your project was approved you would receive the funds. In the last 3 years we have not been able to have anything approved IN SPITE of our favorable track record. And as far as I know NONE of my customers have had their projects approved.In other words, LOCTI became a mere new tax that nobody knows where it is spent. Though we are all sure that corruption benefits from it.

My suggestion is that there is a need to review some laws that have become abusive ways to tax business. For example, bringing back LOCTI to its original purpose would update reasonably fast the technology of the business still alive. make them more competitive, more productive. I would be willing to bet that LOCTI back to its old self could have by itself a 5% hit in productivity in less than two years at a minimum cost for the state.

Impossibility to get raw material, supplies and services

The three points that I mentioned above would cost little to the country and would allow productivity to increase a lot just within a year, while allowing a better control of inflation (bringing it down to lower two digits is another story, but we have to start somewhere, don't we?).

The big problem we have RIGHT NOW, is that inventories of raw materials are low. Ourselves have no inventory for about half of what we could produce and no more than a month for what we can produce. When we reopen in two weeks we will be able to produce at 25% only, for a couple of months at most. It is that simple, and that simple for all business in Venezuela today.

We cannot solve easily this situation as oil prices are down, as the regime fiscal situation is a mess, as there is simply no $$$$ to buy raw materials outside as we produce very little of them here. I will discuss that in a following post. However there is something simple that the regime could do right now to help restart the economy. Absolute priority for the few $$$$$ available should be for food, medicine and spare parts. Forget about TV, travel, new cars, whisky, Italian panettone and the like for a couple of years. The only imports for the next year should be raw material for;
- a few targeted food items that can start fast. For example I can vouch that poultry and pork production could be sufficient within a year. Within two years we could get back in onions, tomatoes and few other vegetables if local producers were allowed to bring the supplies they need (privatize Agrosileña?). We could ban imports of pasta but allow freely import of wheat to do all the pasta we need here.
- raw material for medicine manufacturing (we can do a lot of generics already, we only need the regime to allow for those imports). And medical supplies of course, as our big ticket item that could be provided for easily by cutting half of the oil we send to Cuba.
- spare parts of any type. No more new trucks or cars for a year but at least all the spare parts the ageing transport system needs.

That is it, the only three things that can come in for at least a year. We need workers to be fed, cured and we need stuff to be distributed across the country. I know, it sounds very primitive, very fourth world. But that is what chavismo turned us into. No?

Conclusion

I am not inventing the wheel here. But I am offering simple measures, that would have a relatively low cost for the state and that would allow production to jump start. I am willing to bet that if the above is applied in the next three months in a year from now we can end the recession. That is the advantage of a destroyed economy, when you start from 0, such as after a war, growth is fast. And chavismo has been like a war. We are now in a post war recovery if the regime changes, if its only objective is not anymore corruption and looting.

One can always dream.



Saturday, January 3, 2015

Tintin turns 85 this month

For those who do not know where my comic book heart has always resided, there is a corner of my writing desk.

It has accompanied me through my many desks for nearly 30 years.

I probably would not be the blogger that I have been if it were not for Tintin. Do not ask me to explain that, you get it or you do not.

Friday, January 2, 2015

There are reasonable options but no one cares

UPDATE

To follow up this post I wrote about the "productivity problem" and the "fiscal problem" of Venezuela.
-------------------------

With the objective of being ever so helpful and dodging the bullet on me always a critic, I am offering for this starting year a few things that could be done to temper somehow the economic crisis in Venezuela (1). I am, of course, perfectly aware that the regime will probably not come close to a single one, and that the opposition would not dare to state clearly what should be done. Sigh....


Thus I am writing from ground zero, from the perspective of someone with a small business that thinks at ways he could improve his production, hire people, etc...    Not being a big time economist I am allowing myself anyway to say that my opinion is relevant and that if people like me were heard a little bit more by economists maybe things would not be so bad. But I am digressing.

To tackle this subject let me state that in the current crisis there are several distinct problems, the main ones being:

- difficulty to produce anything
- fiscal crisis
- oil revenue crisis recently added
- astronomical corruption
- political impossibility to form any "grand coalition" to take some measures because too many of the potential partners have economic privileges that they are unwilling to compromise.

The last three ones have been the bulk of this blog posts in recent weeks. There is no point for me discussing them again now. I will limit myself to the first two items, productivity problem and fiscal crisis in two coming separate posts. Stayed tuned over the week end.

Just to close this intro, of the last three ones the last one is the worst. If there were political will, if there were some kind of coalition, corruption could be tamed to a manageable level and good administration could avoid the worst effects of oil price drop. But opposition has embarked on a sterile quarrel between supporters of "la salida" and the others, between those who benefit indirectly from the regime and want "peace" and those who legitimately have lost patience. The regime is worse off, diied between corrupt, narco military, radicals and what not. What is worrisome is that the radical wing seems in the upswing and folks like "Marea Roja" are calling for control of Polar, a folly that will bring us instantly to Cuban levels of survival.  Not only consensus is impossible inside each camp, but the possibility of consensus across the line is remoter.

--------------

1) I need not remind the gentle reader that as blogger that will never run for elective office in Venezuela, who is out of contact with any of the political parties that have a chance to reach power and could appoint him to something, never mind the strong likelihood that I would reject the offer, there is no point for me to suggest things that should be done. If you wish to read people offering radical "solutions", you have Twitter for that. Still, when I feel it appropriate to remind the gentle reader that there are options I do not mind writing them down, like I am starting to do today.

Thursday, January 1, 2015

What 2014 left for Venezuela

It is kind of late to look at 2014 overall. I did resume the year for Venezuela but one should try to use the holidays to let the dust settle some and see what did really matter. Thus my very unbiased, very objective feelings (oxymoron intended) on what from 2014 will direct 2015.

In Venezuela there is a pithy answer; the drop in oil prices has set the stage for a catastrophic 2015. Having left the country bereft of a self sustainable private sector, a country depending on 95% from oil for its livelihood, the regime is at a loss about what to do. The more so that they were incapable of seeing what was in store, something that already 2013 oracles announced. Combine this with a regime that is unable to stop stealing from the public coffers and there is your perfect storm reaching the shores.

Oil prices are not going to recover anytime soon, even if a volcano erupts from under Saudi Arabia oil terminals. Libya may produce more oil in 2015. Iraq may keep its production. Russia will hold to its European market.  But that is not all. The perspective of a Syriza victory in Greece and a good showing of PODEMOS is Spain (I do not think they will win but they can block a stable government after the elections) are enough to stop European recovery. Never mind that Italy and France seem unable to take the necessary measures to revamp their economies.

If Europe fails to recover, if the US has troubles (after all the drop in oil prices is a minus at first before becoming a bonus as oil companies lose earnings) then China and India may not grow as much. Less incentives yet for oil price increases. Never mind that Saudi Arabia may want to downgrade its competition to irrelevant status by driving oil prices further down for a few months. They can afford it.

What scares me the most is that there is absolutely no hint that inside the regime they understand that it is quite possible the Venezuela's oil will not go above 50 USD a barrel for at least a year. And my guess is 2 years.

The other tail wind that 2014 left is the falling apart of the left, from the extreme in Cuba to the naive one in Brazil. If I agree that the embargo on Cuba had run its course, more because of the unwillingness by actors to truly apply it rather than it being a mistaken approach, I think that Cuba will remain a vicious dictatorship through 2015, and, for that matter, as long as Fidel is alive. It does not matter what the West will do, the more so that this one cares way more about business than the rights of Yoani Sanchez.

Still, that Raul has decided to talk to the US to prepare his own retirement into a hoped for peaceful sunset (for him) has created an ideological problem in Latin America that will probably break apart leftist coalitions who were united strictly along anti US positions. Venezuela's chavismo is the first candidate on that list. But the effect can be quite sensible in Brasil (with a weak Dilma) and Argentina where Cristina may even face personal legal trouble. The current Chile coalition could also be affected, pushing mercifully Bachelet more to the right, along the lines of her first term. All in all this is a good development for LatAm though the benefits will only begin to be seen once Fidel finally croaks, so strong the religious myths is.

But there is something that gives me a little bit of optimism. In addition of the Castros expected end, we need to add the revulsion against outright terrorism like ISIS in Syria and Iraq. I suspect that in the future budding terrorist states will be contained earlier. I am sure that from Brussels to Washington people are worrying that a narco state in crisis like Venezuela may resort to official terrorism at home and abroad to justify its existence, the more so that Cuba may not support it as much, that the FARC in Colombia may be reaching their own end of the road, that Russia has no cash to support the Venezuelan regime and that China is getting tired of throwing good money after bad. I am not saying whatsoever that the Marines are landing soon, nor I am advocating such. What I know is that pariah states do live in part at the sufferance of others. Zimbabwe mess was in part due to South Africa acquiescence, Cuba was for many years a convenient scarecrow for the US, Qaddafi was a reminder that dictatorships like Mubarak or Ben Ali were a much lesser evil, Burma was the potential Indian Ocean harbor for China.

In a fragile global world, trouble makers like Venezuela will be less and less acceptable. The regime's option are shrinking fast and even an open repressive dictatorship may not be an option anymore.


Happy 2015

For those who have can have a go at it.  For those in Venezuela, best luck in 2015.